Abstract: This study examines the paradox of persistent conflict and elusive unity among Muslim-majority states, using Iran and Saudi Arabia as a case. It explores how sectarian narratives and geopolitical rivalries inhibit regional cooperation despite shared religious identity. Using Social Constructivism and Contemporary Conflict Theory, this qualitative content analysis investigates how historical grievances, identity politics, and external interventions shaped the rivalry. Drawing on journals, policy texts, and official reports, the findings suggest that intra-Muslim cooperation is more likely where pluralistic identities, economic collaboration, and diplomatic dialogue prevail—while sectarianism, proxy wars, and hegemonic ambitions intensify conflict. The study contributes to peacebuilding literature by proposing culturally rooted frameworks for reconciliation and calls for reform in regional institutions like the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) to foster durable Muslim unity.
Keywords: Sectarianism Cooperation Conflict Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Social Constructivism.
Title: Constructed Sectarianism and Strategic Rivalry: The Iran–Saudi Conflict and the Crisis of Intra-Muslim Cooperation
Author: DATU MODEN C. TALANDIG, DATU AL-ZAHID HANOK SALIK
International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research
ISSN 2348-3156 (Print), ISSN 2348-3164 (online)
Vol. 13, Issue 3, July 2025 - September 2025
Page No: 232-248
Research Publish Journals
Website: www.researchpublish.com
Published Date: 21-August-2025
